Both TunnelBear and VyprVPN showed similar increases in interest during March 2020 with the peaks in their graphs coinciding with one another. The competition between “VyprVPN” and “ TunnelBear VPN” was almost neck and neck but the average interest in TunnelBear VPN was slightly more than in VyprVPN. VyprVPN’s dependable no-logs policy also has a role to play in its high popularity at a time when internet users are more prone to cyber-attacks and cybers talking. The interest in “VyprVPN” was higher than that in “ TorGuard VPN” by a fair margin probably due to the all-round capabilities of VyprVPN as opposed to TorGuard which specializes in torrenting and streaming. However, interest in the search term increased since around 8 th March 2020 and is steadily going strong as of now. There were also small periods of declined interest as recently as February 2020 and earlier this month. “VyprVPN” showed a sustained period of high interest from August 2019 to January 2020. There was no problem while browsing the internet either.Īll data provided below relates to the interest in the keywords over the past 12 months in the United States only. Though the ping time almost doubled from our previous server to 276 ms, the download speed was a decent 27.07 Mbps and it allowed me to watch videos without buffering. To check how the distant servers fared in the speed tests, I connected to a server in Hong Kong, Asia. Latency jumped to 146 ms but I will not complain given the high speeds and enjoyable experience on the USA servers. Streaming Netflix USA was a dream on this server as was torrenting thanks to the impressively high upload speed. On changing servers to the USA, I was surprised to get an average download and upload speed of 34.76 Mbps and 26.81Mbps. The ping time increased to 76 ms but it was still within acceptable limits. The download speed decreased by 20% to 30.23 Mbps and the upload speed was 15.22 Mbps, still quite high. I switched server location to the UK and got decent speed on it too. The 2.3% drop in download speed is negligible and playing HD videos on YouTube was as smooth as possible. The first server was in Amsterdam and it recorded an impressive download speed of 37.27 Mbps and upload speed of 17.87 Mbps with a ping time of 79 ms. When I clicked “connect”, VyprVPN automatically connected me to the optimal server based on my location and network preferences. I tested each server at least thrice in 24 hours with more than 4 hours gap between each test and the following results are an average of all the speed tests.īefore I connected to VyprVPN, my download and upload speeds were 38.13 Mbps and 27.85 Mbps respectively with a ping time of 22 ms. To judge the credibility of its lofty claim, I put to test some of VyprVPN’s servers with the help of. VyprVPN claims, as all VPN services do, to provide lightning-fast speeds on all of its servers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |